U.S. and Ukrainian delegates met in Saudi Arabia to discuss protecting critical infrastructure, reflecting ongoing diplomatic efforts to resolve the Russia-Ukraine War. U.S. envoy Witkoff expressed optimism for ending this protracted conflict, while President Zelenskyy’s team approached the discussions in a constructive manner. However, the recent ceasefire agreement faces scrutiny amid ongoing attacks.
On March 24, 2025, Ukrainian and U.S. delegations convened in Saudi Arabia, discussing strategies to safeguard energy facilities and critical infrastructure, as reported by Ukraine’s Defence Minister. This meeting is part of President Donald Trump’s diplomatic efforts to resolve the ongoing conflict that has persisted for three years.
The gathering precedes a significant meeting between U.S. and Russian delegations scheduled for Monday. U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff conveyed a sense of optimism, indicating that there are feasible chances for ending Europe’s most severe conflict since World War II.
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy asserted that Ukraine’s delegation operated in a highly constructive manner, highlighting the discussions as beneficial and indicative of ongoing cooperative efforts. Defence Minister Rustem Umerov emphasized that the goal of the talks was to facilitate a “just peace” while also enhancing security, although they were deemed mainly technical by Zelenskyy.
Recently, Russia’s President Putin agreed to Trump’s proposition to halt attacks on one another’s energy infrastructure for a period of 30 days. However, this tentative ceasefire has been questioned due to reports of continued military strikes from both parties.
In summary, the recent discussions between Ukrainian and U.S. delegations in Saudi Arabia represent a continued diplomatic effort to end the Russia-Ukraine War after three years. With expressions of optimism from both officials and hope for constructive dialogue, the potential for a peaceful resolution remains a central focus. However, challenges persist, as evidenced by the recent doubts surrounding the proposed ceasefire agreement.
Original Source: m.economictimes.com
