The Supreme Court disclosed a report regarding Justice Yashwant Varma, involving alleged cash findings at his house. Justice Varma rejects the claims, asserting no cash was present and indicating a possible conspiracy against him. He clarifies that he was not at home during the incident and all family financial transactions are recorded through formal channels. The investigation continues.
On March 14, a firefighting operation revealed semi-burnt cash at the residence of Justice Yashwant Varma, a judge of the Delhi High Court. The Supreme Court subsequently released a report, which included photographs and video evidence, and directed Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya to refrain from assigning any judicial responsibilities to Justice Varma during the inquiry.
Justice Varma firmly denied the allegations regarding the discovery of cash at his bungalow. He expressed disbelief over the video content, suggesting a conspiracy aimed at tarnishing his reputation. According to him, the storeroom in question is generally used for storing various items and is accessible to many.
Justice Varma clarified that on the day the fire occurred, he and his wife were away in Madhya Pradesh, with only his daughter and elderly mother present at home. The fire brigade was contacted by his daughter, and once the fire was extinguished, the family found no cash or currency.
He emphasized that neither he nor his family stored cash in the storeroom. Justice Varma presented the argument that housing cash in a commonly accessed storeroom would be highly improbable. Furthermore, he outlined that all financial transactions by his family are documented and conducted through banking avenues.
The judge maintained that upon their return and after the scene was secured, nothing pertinent regarding cash was observed. He expressed skepticism about the existence of any burnt currency, asserting that his staff reported no such findings either. Justice Varma reiterated that no currency—intact or burnt—was present in the storeroom, reinforcing his original assertion of innocence.
In conclusion, Justice Yashwant Varma strongly contests the allegations of cash being found at his residence during a firefighting incident. He maintains that no monetary evidence was present and suggests that the narrative presented may be part of a conspiracy against him. Justice Varma’s defense rests on the assertion that all financial dealings are appropriately documented and that no evidence has substantiated the claims made against him. The ongoing inquiry will further delve into these serious allegations.
Original Source: www.ndtv.com
