The article explores the historical roots of sympathy towards Russia in South Africa, where its ‘anti-colonial’ narrative resonates, particularly among the African National Congress. Figures like Sue Dobson exemplify the ties formed during the Cold War, and contemporary grassroots support reinforces Russia’s appeal as an ally against Western influence. The complexities of this relationship reflect a nuanced understanding of historical legacies and current geopolitical dynamics.
In South Africa, Russia’s historical ties and its ‘anti-colonial’ narrative significantly influence public opinion. This sympathy towards modern Russia has deep roots, tracing back to the Cold War era, particularly through figures such as Sue Dobson, who, recruited by the African National Congress (ANC) in 1986, received training in Moscow to combat apartheid.
Dobson’s recollections of her training highlight the support the Soviet Union offered anti-colonial movements, as she engaged in surveillance and various exercises in Leningrad. Upon returning to South Africa, she worked for the apartheid regime’s propaganda wing but fled to the UK when her family’s ANC connections were revealed.
The complexity of Russia’s involvement in African affairs reveals a nuanced legacy, as only half of African governments condemned Russia in the 2022 United Nations proceedings following Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. Moscow’s historical actions, such as supporting Ethiopia during the Italo-Ethiopian War, have shaped a narrative among many supporting contemporary Russia.
Notably, while exaggerated, the state-sponsored narrative paints Russia as a historic ally of anti-imperialist efforts. The contributions made by Russian nationals during the Cold War, especially in nations like Angola and Egypt, fostered collaboration that resonated deeply within the ANC.
Despite some accounts highlighting instances of racial discrimination faced by African students in Soviet institutions, their belief in the opportunities of Soviet education remains a testament to the allure of Moscow’s ideological framework. This connection feeds the ANC’s ongoing neutral stance regarding Russia, given its historical support for the liberation movement.
Grassroots sentiment echoes similar support, evidenced by counter-demonstrations featuring Russian flags in response to pro-Ukrainian gatherings in South Africa. Notably, Moscow’s debt forgiveness and security engagement in several African nations amplify the appeal of its ‘anti-colonial’ narrative, as local elites find alignment with Russia’s stance against Western hegemony.
Polianichev notes that while Russia’s historical narrative of anti-imperialism is questioned, its current opposition to the West grants it a strategic relevance, suggesting a potential reevaluation should the political landscape evolve.
In conclusion, the enduring sympathy for Russia in South Africa stems from historical ties and its self-proclaimed role as an anti-colonial ally. The ANC’s past connections to the Soviet Union reflect a legacy that continues to influence contemporary perceptions. Moreover, grassroots support and Russia’s strategic moves in Africa further underscore its appeal as a counterbalance to Western powers, resonating with local leaders and citizens alike. Ultimately, the intertwining of history and present-day geopolitics reveals the complexities of public opinion surrounding Russia in South Africa.
Original Source: www.aljazeera.com
