Congress MP Shashi Tharoor expressed regret for opposing India’s stance during the Russia-Ukraine war, acknowledging the complexities involved in formulating the nation’s position. He noted that India’s policy puts it in a unique place to contribute to lasting peace. Tharoor also mentioned potential openness to peacekeeping if an agreement is achieved, contrasting with previous objections to international military interventions.
Shashi Tharoor, a member of the Indian Parliament, recently reflected on his earlier criticism of India’s response to the Russia-Ukraine war, expressing sentiments of embarrassment for opposing the nation’s stance at that time. He acknowledged that the policy adopted by India has positioned the country to potentially contribute to a sustainable peace between the conflicting nations.
In 2022, Tharoor articulated his views on India’s reaction to the crisis, stating that it faced challenges in formulating a position that would not antagonize Russia. His initial remarks indicated a preference for India to condemn the aggression against Ukraine, noting significant violations of international law and the UN charter.
Furthermore, Tharoor emphasized that India’s unique position allows it to play a constructive role in fostering peace, largely due to its geographical distance from the European conflict. He mentioned the possibility of India considering sending peacekeepers if a mutual agreement for peace between Russia and Ukraine were reached, although he clarified that he could not speak on behalf of the government due to his status in the opposition.
Tharoor pointed out that, unlike past situations such as the 2003 request for India to send troops to Iraq—which faced considerable opposition—he believes there would be greater openness towards peacekeeping efforts in Ukraine, provided there was a consensus for peace.
In summary, Shashi Tharoor’s reflections on India’s stance regarding the Russia-Ukraine conflict illustrate the complexities involved in international diplomacy. His acknowledgment of past criticisms highlights a shift towards a more constructive role for India in advocating for peace, contingent on the situation developing favorably between the warring parties. Tharoor’s insights suggest a readiness to engage in peacekeeping efforts should the circumstance warrant such action, differing from earlier resistance encountered in past military interventions.
Original Source: www.hindustantimes.com
