President Putin indicated Russia’s conditional acceptance of a 30-day ceasefire aimed at achieving long-term peace in Ukraine. Concerns were raised regarding Ukrainian troop status, rearming issues, and verification processes. The proposal follows discussions mediated by the U.S., emphasizing a diplomatic push to resolve ongoing conflict amidst fears of military escalation and economic challenges in Russia.
On Thursday, Russian President Vladimir Putin stated that Russia is amenable to a proposed 30-day ceasefire in Ukraine, contingent upon its potential to foster long-term peace and address the conflict’s underlying issues. During a joint press conference with Belarusian leader Alexander Lukashenko, Putin emphasized the necessity for the cessation of hostilities to result in a resolution of the conflict’s root causes.
The Kremlin has consistently maintained that its invasion was justified to protect Russian speakers in eastern Ukraine and to eliminate what it perceives as neo-Nazi elements within Ukraine’s government and military. Additionally, the Kremlin has accused NATO of attempting to establish a military presence in Ukraine, thereby encroaching upon Russia’s western border.
During the press conference, Putin expressed concerns regarding the status of Ukrainian troops reportedly remaining in the southwestern Kursk region, questioning how they would be addressed in any ceasefire agreement. He remarked, “Are we supposed to let them go after they committed mass crimes against civilians?” highlighting the complexities involved in relaxing hostilities.
Earlier that day, Russia’s Defense Ministry declared that its forces regained control of the town of Sudzha, which had been under Ukrainian occupation for seven months. Ukraine had previously captured a significant area in the Kursk region, yet Russian troops were conducting a swift counteroffensive, nearing the expulsion of Ukrainian forces from this territory.
Putin further scrutinized the use of the proposed ceasefire period, raising the issue of Ukraine potentially rearming within the thirty days. He articulated concerns regarding the mechanisms of control and verification during this time, questioning how it would prevent forced mobilization or the influx of additional weaponry into Ukraine.
The Russian president’s comments followed Ukraine’s acceptance of a U.S.-brokered ceasefire during discussions held in Saudi Arabia. Putin signaled that he would await further discussions with U.S. officials before finalizing Russia’s position, noting that, “The idea itself is correct, and we undoubtedly support it, but there are issues we need to discuss.”
Moreover, U.S. President Donald Trump has expressed his hope for Putin’s agreement to the ceasefire, albeit with warnings of severe sanctions should negotiations falter. Trump asserted, “I want to see peace. And we’re getting close to getting something done,” reflecting a desire for diplomatic resolution amid dwindling economic conditions in Russia.
As the situation evolves, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has advocated for a ceasefire devoid of preconditions, urging Moscow to engage in constructive negotiations without delays. The call for a rapid resolution indicates the international community’s commitment to alleviating tensions in Ukraine, though lingering doubts remain about compliance and sincerity from all involved parties.
The proposed 30-day ceasefire in Ukraine, endorsed by President Vladimir Putin, is contingent upon establishing long-term peace and addressing fundamental causes of the conflict. Russia’s concerns regarding Ukrainian troop presence, rearmament, and the verification process underscore the complexities of negotiation. Meanwhile, U.S. officials emphasize the importance of an unconditional ceasefire. The international community remains focused on diplomatic paths to end hostilities, though significant challenges persist.
Original Source: www.themoscowtimes.com
